djh, Was my response incoherent? Marsha
On Aug 16, 2013, at 8:16 AM, David Harding <[email protected]> wrote: > >> [Marsha said] >> Disagree if you like, but that's my experience. Maybe the "appreciation" >> happens when one is not trying to grasp either perspective. > >> [Marsha also said] >> Intellectually that may be true, but is that still true from the 360-degree >> perspective? What good is an expanded rationality if it still demonstrates >> aggressiveness and uses character assassination to achieve its ends: same >> old, same old. It doesn't fit. I think some have skipped moving through >> the180-degree point, which is not an intellectual exercise. > > [djh] > > Marsha you wrote: > > "I am at the MD to explore RMP's Metaphysics of Quality and the MoQ's > relationship to Buddhism, and the way they play in living my life." > > How are you here to 'explore' RMP's MOQ? Are you here to explore it > intellectually or in some other way? > > It's bleedingly obvious that you're not here to explore anything > intellectually. You think that talking about Dynamic Quality and > non-grasping and enlightenment and 'ever-changing' things is 'exploring' the > MOQ. But it isn't. To point out something else exceedingly obvious - the > MOQ is an intellectual thing - the type of 'exploring' you want to do is not > intellectual. > > You talk about not being too fixated on something - well I think you're > fearing that in others that which you fear most in yourself. You are the > one fixating on the 180 degree enlightenment point that Dynamic Quality is > the source of all things and neglecting the importance of moving on from this > fact and going back to the patterns themselves to find 360 degree > enlightenment. What you fail to see as a result of your fixation is that > Dynamic Quality as the source of all static quality can actually also be an > *intellectual* insight and not just an experience of Dynamic Quality. This > is what Paul Turner talks about in his two contexts paper. Only once you > appreciate this intellectual fact will you be able to move on into looking > intellectually at the patterns themselves. > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
