[djh] Trouble is Arlo, I've never said anything otherwise. [Arlo] Yes. You did. You argued that Paul's "context one" was "Dynamic/East" and his "context 2" was "static/West". This is a much different that saying context one is epistemological and context two is ontological.
What I see you now trying to do is, somehow, move to equate epistemology with "Dynamic/east", and ontology with "static/West", out of misunderstanding of what these views value. You keep insisting "context one" is "Dynamic" and "context two" is "static" and as long as you insist this you have both misinterpreted Paul and misunderstood Pirsig. I am really not sure I have anything more to add. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
