I suggest you take your fantasies to a good friend or a professional as I am not qualified to take them seriously enough to provide a comment.
On Aug 31, 2013, at 5:55 AM, Andre Broersen <[email protected]> wrote: > Marsha to Andre: > > Do you have an intelligent question to ask? > > Andre: > Ah, nr 9 eh? > > I am simply wondering when you are going to own up. When are you going to > argue something coherent around the writings of Pirsig in the light of what > the Buddha taught us that makes sense. That seems to be your hypothetical > mission here but as soon as you receive any form of criticism in the light of > a quote you present you slither away like an eel in a bucket full of snot. > > As far as I am aware you still think that the MoQ = Reality ( like the menu = > the food). You still argue that DQ = sq (therefore all sq is hypothetical and > illusory). You still deny the role of latching, you still argue intellect = > SOM (reified and all). > > All these are contrary to Pirsig's statements and mission in an effort to > develop a metaphysics that will improve the world a little bit. The only > response we get from you is like the latest fashion show; at present the > magic word is 'detachment', stop thinking (that's evil's reification itself) > be 'in the now', and all suffering will just vanish. > > If you are convinced of that what the fuck are you doing here on a > philosophical discussion site? > > Why do you think the Buddha bothered to get up from under the Bodhi tree > after his enlightenment? > > I suppose you are just trolling around! > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
