Do you have an intelligent question to ask?
On Aug 30, 2013, at 8:23 AM, Andre Broersen <[email protected]> wrote: > Marsha said to Andre: > Accusation without proof (including cited and researchable context) is mere > gossip. > > Andre: > Oh dear. Sigh. Nr 8? The archives are full of the proofs Lucy. > > Marsha said: > > It might be that any one of your 1. - 7. is an acceptable response within a > given context. > > Andre: > Not on a philosophical discussion site it is not. Especially since the > confusing bits and pieces you present are only to provoke/deflate/nihilate > from which you then slither away. You simply do not address the issues dmb, > Ron, Arlo, Anthony, myself (and others)present to you. That is why the 1-7 > (there are undoubtedly others you can pull out of the box, just see above) > are not acceptable. > > Marsha continues: > > And if you want to complain about what is irresponsible behavior within this > intellectual/philosophical forum, you might want to review your own > "bucket-full-of-snot" posts. > > Andre: > And I gave reasons as to why I think they are a b-f-o-s. To wit: you keep in > slithering away using any variation of the 1-7 (+ 1) responses. > > Marsha keeps on going: > But, don't read my posts if they offend your intellectual sensibility, and > you might also try to remember "The real cycle you're working on is a cycle > called yourself." > > Andre: > Yes, and I am responding to a type of behaviour and response that needs lots > of work but is obviously not seen or recognized. I remember reading the other > day that the most difficult and irritating person is an ego that's had a > glimpse of 'the light', call it a profound insight. They are irritating > because they immediately think they have seen it all. They are impervious to > correction or learning. They have developed an 'inner detachment', an 'inner > dryness'. All goings on in the 'conditioned' world (within which you and I > live) are regarded by them as petty little illusory nothings. Hypotheticall > dreamy states full of self-inflicted suffering. A hopelessly directed Greek > tragedy at best. If only these petty little specks knew what I know. > > The 'eternal', 'nirvana', DQ alone is real. They begin to scorn petty little > people living their petty little lives. Dq is none other than sq. Sq is none > other than DQ... aggrandizing themselves in the process as being, somehow, > above all that sq. Snuggling in the DQ womb. > > Why? Because they are scared as hell. Because there is still something grand > to complete... and then to travel the 180 degrees to the marketplace, the > 'valley' (ZMM) And THAT is scary as hell. > > Of course my ears stood up as I saw connections, and not just a few when > reading this, connections with your behaviour and statements here on this > discuss. > > Yes, the above Pirsig quote is a good one and I am working away on it but I > do not make the statements you do and do not behave as you do here on this > discuss (and don't attribute this to different upbringings please, or > histories and values). You are simply confused. > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
