Marsha to Andre:

Do you have an intelligent question to ask?

Andre:
Ah, nr 9 eh?

I am simply wondering when you are going to own up. When are you going to argue 
something coherent around the writings of Pirsig in the light of what the 
Buddha taught us that makes sense. That seems to be your hypothetical mission 
here but as soon as you receive any form of criticism in the light of a quote 
you present you slither away like an eel in a bucket full of snot.

As far as I am aware you still think that the MoQ = Reality ( like the menu = 
the food). You still argue that DQ = sq (therefore all sq is hypothetical and 
illusory). You still deny the role of latching, you still argue intellect = SOM 
(reified and all).

All these are contrary to Pirsig's statements and mission in an effort to 
develop a metaphysics that will improve the world a little bit.  The only 
response we get from you is like the latest fashion show; at present the magic 
word is 'detachment', stop thinking (that's evil's reification itself) be 'in 
the now', and all suffering will just vanish.

If you are convinced of that what the fuck are you doing here on a 
philosophical discussion site?

Why do you think the Buddha bothered to get up from under the Bodhi tree after 
his enlightenment?

I suppose you are just trolling around!


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to