Hi DMB

I'll take incoherent back for a second,  you say DQ is full of content,  I say 
it is full of pattern, let's say it is full of X, now why is content so much 
better a word than pattern, what rules it out? Is there a better word for X? I 
have tried the split between DQ and SQ as pre-conceptual patterns and 
conceptual patterns,  you don't like that,  what about dynamic patterns versus 
static patterns? 

Is the moon (a concept) round (a concept)? Let us look and see, well it is 
white (a percept) but does it fill all my experience? No. The white is 
surrounded by black (a percept). So the moon has a shape (a pattern caused by 
the percepts not the concepts) and this shape is round (a concept). For you the 
shape-pattern of the moon is a concept,  for me round is a concept but the 
perceived shape in our experience is not a concept it is just a specific shape 
that we then come to notice and describe as round and the moon,  we can point 
to it before we call it the moon or describe it,  other people can see where in 
this common experience we are pointing and see this pattern in their experience 
too,  if it is not a pattern how can they turn to see something and suddenly 
realise it is there, if concepts are required to turn percepts into patterns 
how do we experience new things that come along and surprise us? Do concepts 
require work to make them or do you think they just pop into existence prior to 
culture and language? I just cannot make sense of what you think concepts mean?

David M

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [MD] Static Patterns Rock!
From: David Morey <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
CC: 

Hi DMB

Let me think,  largely from you and your selective quoting. So you are saying 
DQ has no patterns but is full of content,  but you cannot offer any 
description of that content…  sounds pretty confused to me,  perhaps you can 
help,  how do you know DQ is full of content? What is your evidence? I agree DQ 
is full of content,  I call it shapes,  colours,  patterns, etc.

By the way why can you only argue with my position by bending or exaggerating 
it? I do try to stick to what you write,  incoherent though it seems to me.

David M
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to