The politics is possibly crucial: http://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2013/10/10/traumas-of-the-erasure-of-the-real/#more-7479
David M david buchanan <[email protected]> wrote: > >David Morey said to DMB: >...why is content so much better a word than pattern, what rules it out? Is >there a better word for X? I have tried the split between DQ and SQ as >pre-conceptual patterns and conceptual patterns, you don't like that, what >about dynamic patterns versus static patterns? > > >dmb says: >As I have already said over and over, you are misusing Pirsig's key terms, >namely Dynamic Quality and static "patterns" of quality. Those are Pirsig's >terms. We are talking their meaning in a Pirisg discussion group - and the >title of this thread is "Static Patterns Rock". Dude, what the hell is wrong >with your brain? You are being obnoxiously stupid about this point! > >Why, of all the words in the English language, would you want to described >Pirsig's DQ in terms of "patterns"? That is the worst possible choice. It >could not be worse. As I keep saying over and over and over again, "Patterns" >is exactly what DQ is not. > >Seriously, are you daft? Are you playing some sick game? You're talking like >you're a full-blown idiot and you then you act surprised by my objections to >this contradictory drivel! You refuse to acknowledge these totally freaking >obvious contradictions. > >There is static and dynamic. Just two things. But you have to describe the >dynamic in terms of the static. That's just dumb, man. How can you fail to see >that? How could anyone fail to see that? > > > >Moq_Discuss mailing list >Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >Archives: >http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
