Andre,
Who are you? How am I? I might try to respond to a specific and thoughtful question, otherwise I am not interested in you blathering. Marsha > On Nov 9, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > > Marsha to Andre: > It was the best I could do with Ron's rather abbreviated comment: > > Andre: > Bull! Now you are blaming Ron and not looking at your own incompetence. I had > said: > > 'I mean, that, together with the answer given to Ron above just absolutely > kills any decent discussion. A half baked piece of drivel to blame our > 'different static life histories' and an even worse attempted rendition of > Nagarjuna's tetralemma. > > It's a waste of time talking to Lucy on this discuss. She appears to place > herself above learning, above correction, above decency and, to top it all, > above the MoQ. Hence her pursuit to move 'beyond' it as previously stated.' > > You are not confining this type of drivel to Ron either. You do it with every > poster here. I am sure you are not aware of the implications of what you are > saying. Or you possibly are but just do not care one iota. You suggest that > NO DISCUSSION, NO MEANINGFUL EXCHANGE, NO REAL UNDERSTANDING IS POSSIBLE > BETWEEN TWO HUMAN BEINGS. > > You are speaking from monologue. That is what meditation essentially entails. > This is a discussion site talking ABOUT shared understandings and > misunderstandings. > > Boy oh boy, no wonder you see the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima > and Nagasaki, and the horrors of the holocaust as an illusion. > > And all Pirsig attempted to do was to improve the world a little bit through > his MoQ. Wow, you are sure making a mess of things in the name of (your own > version of) MoQ, Nagarjuna and one's 'different static life histories'. > > Shame really. Over and out. > > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
