Just like the word mankind 
Composed of " mank" and "ind"
It's meaning a mystery, just like
Mankind.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 12, 2013, at 3:07 PM, Joseph  Maurer <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi MarshaV and All,
> 
> 
> The "con" "Cum (with)?" (part of "conceptual"?) left Pirsig with no
> alternative but to opt for indefinable DQ.  "Con" seems to be attached to
> Cum latin for with.  Con (with consciousness) and ceptual (capture ?) used
> together seem to be strange bedfellows!  But metaphysics DQ/SQ conquers all.
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
>> On 12/12/13 1:35 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Joe,
>> 
>> I consider metaphysics to be a conceptual model of reality.  Can we agree on
>> this point?
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> p.s.  For those who are Door fans, I hope you've watched 'The Doors: Mr. Mojo
>> Risin': The Story of L.A. Woman'. On youtube:
>> http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EYigFBVNwXU
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 11, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Joseph  Maurer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi MarshaV and all,
>>> 
>>> Love does not grow from a feeling perspective.  Love flows from metaphysical
>>> individuality.  I am alone!  Feeling, idea, decision all participate in the
>>> growing love for individuality.  You Know, like: By this will all men know
>>> you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.
>>> 
>>> Imho Joe 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 12/11/13 3:43 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Feel it in your fingers, feel it in your toes
>>>>     Love is all around you and so the feeling grows
>>>>          It is written on the wind, it's everywhere you go
>>>>               So if you really love me, come on and let it show
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 10, 2013, at 3:36 PM, Joseph  Maurer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi MarshaV and all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I suppose idiosyncrasies are discernable.
>>>>> 
>>>>> For the discernment of reality by an individual sentient DQ/SQ is a proper
>>>>> format.  I experience the indefinable.
>>>>> 
>>>>> How is that possible?
>>>>> 
>>>>> SOM based in definition is inadequate to describe social indefinable
>>>>> reality.  There is no logical argument in defined words able to discern 
>>>>> the
>>>>> indefinable/individual being in reality.  DQ perception is the ball to run
>>>>> with.  
>>>>> 
>>>>> DQ/SQ indefinable/definable base for knowledge.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Pirsig realized that the existence of an indefinable is still discernable!
>>>>> DQ individuality is known beyond definition.  DQ is observed in the
>>>>> experience of individuality and 1 follows.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The reality of the individual is DQ/SQ metaphysical reality.  Words used
>>>>> for
>>>>> the communication of individuality are indefinable and difficult to argue
>>>>> in
>>>>> reality.  Metaphysics!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Joe 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 12/10/13 12:51 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> "We are suspended in language", and your posts are suspended in your
>>>>>> particular idiosyncrasies.
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to