Just like the word mankind Composed of " mank" and "ind" It's meaning a mystery, just like Mankind.
Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 12, 2013, at 3:07 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi MarshaV and All, > > > The "con" "Cum (with)?" (part of "conceptual"?) left Pirsig with no > alternative but to opt for indefinable DQ. "Con" seems to be attached to > Cum latin for with. Con (with consciousness) and ceptual (capture ?) used > together seem to be strange bedfellows! But metaphysics DQ/SQ conquers all. > > Joe > > >> On 12/12/13 1:35 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Joe, >> >> I consider metaphysics to be a conceptual model of reality. Can we agree on >> this point? >> >> >> Marsha >> >> >> p.s. For those who are Door fans, I hope you've watched 'The Doors: Mr. Mojo >> Risin': The Story of L.A. Woman'. On youtube: >> http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EYigFBVNwXU >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Dec 11, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi MarshaV and all, >>> >>> Love does not grow from a feeling perspective. Love flows from metaphysical >>> individuality. I am alone! Feeling, idea, decision all participate in the >>> growing love for individuality. You Know, like: By this will all men know >>> you are my disciples, if you have love for one another. >>> >>> Imho Joe >>> >>> >>>> On 12/11/13 3:43 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Feel it in your fingers, feel it in your toes >>>> Love is all around you and so the feeling grows >>>> It is written on the wind, it's everywhere you go >>>> So if you really love me, come on and let it show >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Dec 10, 2013, at 3:36 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi MarshaV and all, >>>>> >>>>> I suppose idiosyncrasies are discernable. >>>>> >>>>> For the discernment of reality by an individual sentient DQ/SQ is a proper >>>>> format. I experience the indefinable. >>>>> >>>>> How is that possible? >>>>> >>>>> SOM based in definition is inadequate to describe social indefinable >>>>> reality. There is no logical argument in defined words able to discern >>>>> the >>>>> indefinable/individual being in reality. DQ perception is the ball to run >>>>> with. >>>>> >>>>> DQ/SQ indefinable/definable base for knowledge. >>>>> >>>>> Pirsig realized that the existence of an indefinable is still discernable! >>>>> DQ individuality is known beyond definition. DQ is observed in the >>>>> experience of individuality and 1 follows. >>>>> >>>>> The reality of the individual is DQ/SQ metaphysical reality. Words used >>>>> for >>>>> the communication of individuality are indefinable and difficult to argue >>>>> in >>>>> reality. Metaphysics! >>>>> >>>>> Joe >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 12/10/13 12:51 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> "We are suspended in language", and your posts are suspended in your >>>>>> particular idiosyncrasies. >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
