"Andre"
> John: > > You believe people dance from a sense of justice? > > Andre: > You give me the impression that you are deliberately misreading and > ridiculing me John. I thank dmb for praising me for my patience but I'm > afraid I am running out of it. This sort of reply to me making a point > about inter level conflict is almost insulting. The MoQ does not support > this idea. > J: I am sorry if my use of rhetoric gives you that impression, Andre. I assure you with all sincerity that I'm not interested in merely ridiculing or misleading in an attempt to make you look foolish. But I do believe there are some grave mis-interpretations at play here in our reiteration of Pirsgi's work and I guarantee I will work my damnedest to root them out. > > John: > > I think the most helpful way to view it is in terms of SQ and DQ. > Intellect is DQ to society's SQ. > > Andre: > You're getting very close to blowing it John. This is the most ridiculous > statement you've made thus far and you are doing your best to trump the > previous one. Put simply: the MoQ does not support this idea. > > JohnC: Well if you're correct, it's good to know at least that now I've discovered the "voice of the MoQ". My idea of the higher levels being DQ to the lower is just that - an idea. Some ideas are better than others. If mine is bad, fine, it'll die of its own in-aptness. But you don't think there's something inherently wrong in positing ideas, do you Andre? How "intellectual" is that? It sounds like a social rejection rather. > John: > > Hmm. I don't know if I can go with calling Justice, intellectual either. > Fairness seems to be a feeling beyond intellect. > > Andre: > You've blown it John. This is even more ridiculous than the one mentioned > above. Are you in the contest of prime celebrity nut as far as your > understanding of the MoQ goes? Put simply: the MoQ does not support this > idea. > JohnC: What I mean is, we get a feeling of injustice or unfairness first, then rationalize it after the fact. Nobody does it the other way around unless they are completely rule-bound (social) skip and delete cuz I'm busy now/ > > Andre: > I'm sorry John but these sets of responses you gave make me conclude that > you obviously don't understand the MoQ. This will not satisfy your ego but > we all know that, when it comes right down to it, the ego is just a figment > of one's imagination. So don't take my comments personally John, I'm sure > you have a lovely personality. > > I cannot think of anything to gain from further discussion for either of > us John. All the best. > > As you wish, Andre. (my famous last words last time) JohnC Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
