Well, I don't mean to cause hostility, Dave. It just sort of happens. I don't understand why.
Lets all just be friends. John On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:42 AM, david <[email protected]> wrote: > dmb says: > Yes, as in the hot stove example, Quality comes first and the static > descriptions always follow. BUT one can respond to DQ in various ways: > biologically, socially, or intellectually and that will be determined by > one's level of development. That's why it's important to make distinctions > between the levels. Anyone can respond biologically - anyone will jump off > the stove. If we are responding to a book like Pirsig's, biological and > social patterns are simply not good enough. Nobody can do philosophy with > their guts and social level quality isn't going to help much either. Just > as in motorcycle maintenance, you have to have a feel for the work or > things are going to get all hacked up and distorted. That, I think, is > John's problem. He not only doesn't have a feel for the work, he's hostile > to it. > > > > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 03:58:07 +0000 > > Subject: Re: [MD] The Social aspect of SOM > > > > John "Birthday Cake Boy" Carl said earlier this month: > > > > > What I mean is, we get a feeling of injustice or unfairness first, then > > > rationalize it after the fact. Nobody does it the other way around > unless > > > they are completely rule-bound (social) > > > > Ron Kulp replied March 12th 2014: > > > > "Often I don't have the feeling of > > Being screwed when I'm being > > Screwed, often it's after the fact > > And I reflect, do I realize hey that > > Asshole just pulled one over on me, > > Then I feel injustice . > > Like your last post to me. > > It didn't piss me off until I thought > > About it." > > > > > > Ant McWatt comments: > > > > Good for you Ron. > > > > There we have a very good example (possibly even a better one than the > "Hot Stove" example in LILA) where we have a Dynamic "feeling" (or > "intuition"... whatever you like to call "IT") and then see the LATER > static intellectual realisation (by Ron in this particular case rather - > than Spike the dog from the Tom & Jerry cartoons... ) that someone (namely > one John "Birthday Cake Boy" Carl) is actually - despite initial > appearances - trying to make me look like a jackass (or rather foolish - to > put it very politely)! > > > > ;-) > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > -- "finite players play within boundaries. Infinite players play *with* boundaries." Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
