Ron and Dan,

Dan, no I don't think anybody here is a moron.  However one certain
simplistic conceptualization has taken hold that need to be addressed -
what is idealism?

Doing a quick google on the topic turns up this: (from
http://idealismandpragmatism.org/project)

"it may seem that idealism and pragmatism have little to do with one
another and could indeed be seen as intellectual opponents; and some of
their defenders have in fact viewed their relation in this way. So, it may
appear on the one hand to pragmatists, that the idealist represents just
the kind of empty and abstract metaphysical theorizing that they want to
overturn, while to idealists on the other hand, the pragmatist may be
viewed as offering a position that cannot resolve the problems that concern
them, in refusing to engage with such problems properly by offering instead
a crude appeal to ‘practical consequences’. It could be assumed, then, that
these two traditions will simply confront each other as philosophical
opposites.

However, on closer inspection, it is clear that historically this has been
far from the case, while looking forward, there is much to be learned from
exploring common ground, as well as thinking more deeply about where the
divergences between them may lie.

So, for example, while historically F. H. Bradley and William James
presented themselves as at odds in their published writings, in their
private correspondences they recognized a greater degree of convergence;
and while Peirce on occasion denounced both Kant and Hegel, he also on
other occasions expressed his warm appreciation for their views. Likewise,
figures like Dewey and Sellars were explicit in claiming a shared ancestry
for their respective positions.

And more thematically, there is much that suggests how far idealism and
pragmatism can be aligned, for example in relation to the question of
naturalism and how that should be best conceived, or in relation to
skepticism and how that is to be dealt with, or in considering the issue of
how social norms arise and how they come to be upheld.

Indeed, it is this kind of common ground that explains how many of the most
prominent contemporary philosophers, such as Jürgen Habermas, Richard
Rorty, Hilary Putnam, Robert Brandom, Richard Bernstein and others, may be
said to draw inspiration from *both* these traditions, in finding ways in
which they can reinforce one another."

So I'm not just pulling my objections out of my head - Idealism is hard to
pin down but one common understanding of the term is that it signifies
anything that says, Reality is more than merely Objects.  A very wide
perspective indeed!  Pinning down how much more, is a huge task that
encompasses many different metaphysical positions, including, I'd say, the
MoQ.

Thanks for your patience,


John


PS:  I DO think the MOQ melds Pragmatism and Idealism in a unique and
interesting way that ought to be presented and considered at conferences
such as the one linked above.






On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:11 AM, Ron Kulp <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 14, 2014, at 8:25 PM, John Carl <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Idealism is realism fierce opponent.  It's not simply a matter of
> > "mutually exclusive" it's a matter of mutually hostile.  And how the MoQ
> > unites them... I have no idea except that so far the interpreters of the
> > MOQ have no real conception of what idealism actually is.
>
> Ron sez:
> I think what Pragmatism opposes
> Is a particular brand of Idealism
> John. I believe British Idealism
> As it refers to existentialism and
> Phenomenology.
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>


-- 
"finite players
play within boundaries.
Infinite players
play *with* boundaries."
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to