> On Dec 18, 2014, at 3:27 AM, Ant McWatt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Define the Good as a type of Form? What an ABSOLUTE moron! That's analogous > to defining God (which is really just another synonym - ultimately - for the > Good/Dynamic Quality).
Ron comments: I have been pursuing this subject For the past couple of months, The history of defining Dynamic Quality. It's seems to pre-date Plato. Parmenides, Pythagoras And earlier. What struck me is That the definitions hint at the Fact that it can not be defined. Every concept fails, even the most Basic, like time and movement. What is really interesting is how The definition, which essentially states it's indefinability becomes A reified concept in and of itself! All of western culture is influenced By the literal interpretation of this definition. It became the conceptualization Of God and the afterlife. When It originally pointed to the mind And it's inability to grasp the Un graspable. The theory of forms Or the doctrine of ideas is the most Famously misunderstood concept In the history of humanity. . > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
