Baggini wrote:
"The clash of civilisations is happening not between Islam and the West,
as we are often led to believe, but between pragmatic relativism and
dogmatic certainty."
Ron said:
I know Baggini is not too well favored here but he does make an interesting
observation much akin to RMP in regard to cultural crisis and the return to
conservative dogma.
dmb says:
Yes, Pirsig says something similar about the clash between relativism and
dogmatic certainty. Like Baggini, he says that things like fascism and
fundamentalism are reactionary movements and are, in a sense, the backlash
against relativism. But Pirsig is quite okay with classical pragmatism and
blames value-free objectivity for giving us relativism - not to mention a sense
of meaninglessness and artlessness.
Pragmatic truth sits between the extremes of relativism and dogmatic certainty.
It's far too empirical to count as relativism, unlike Rorty's neo-pragmatism,
and the plural and provisional nature of pragmatic truths is far too flexible
to count as dogmatic.
We don't need Truth to be Objective, Fixed, Absolute, or Eternal and we can't
have that kind of truth anyway. But we do need truth to be vigorous enough and
strong enough to kill lies, bullshit, fanaticism, propaganda, honest mistakes
and good old fashioned stupidity. We need excellence in thought and speech and
ideas that actually work when they're put into practice.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
