At 06:28 AM 2/15/2007, Kevin wrote: >Hello Marsha, > >I agree with your description of this forum. But no description of >this forum will >help identify the MOQ's environment unless of course this forum is that >environment. > >One problem I have with the MOQ is that it does not exist in any >clear, concise >form. I can't go to any library or book store to obtain anything I >can point to and >say truthfully that the Metaphysics of Quality is delineated >here. So from this >point of view the MOQ is imune from control because it doesn't exist >as an object >that can be controlled. Robert Pirsig came up with the concept be >he chose not >to delineate it in any recognizable, objective form. > >And yet this forum continues to ruminate about the MOQ; what it says >and what it >doesn't say. People point to Pirsig's two books, what Anthony McWatt has >published and other papers authored by Pirsig and other advocates of the MOQ. >But there is still no consensus on what is the definitive >Metaphysics of Quality. > >Sincerely and honestly from my character and energy, >
Hi Kevin, It is stated that Buddhism is a religion of no-religion. Maybe the MOQ is a metaphysics of no-metaphysics. But of course, RMP can set the record straight if he chooses. m moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
