Platt baiting, surely not ? However many (thousands of) problems, there are millions of satisfied cases. As usual Platt's problem is if it aint right it must be wrong, whereas anyone with a brain would look at how to address the problems and fix the imprefections. Evolution I believe it's called.
Ian On 4/13/07, Arlo Bensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Platt] > Using the MOQ as a moral guide, my question is, "Why not?" I find > nothing in the MOQ that suggests that government controlled universal > health care is a moral demand. But, I could be wrong. > > [Arlo] > Nor do I find anything in the MOQ suggestion human life is a market > commodity. Quite the opposite, I find Pirsig stating quite clearly > that a human being (as a source of ideas) is something to be > preserved unless (the only exception I can find) is s/he poses an > imminent threat to society. > > [Platt to Jos] > Are you suggesting there are not many other examples? > > [Arlo] > Are you suggesting there are not many counter-examples in the > American health care system? Again, check out "Sick". > (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18038612/site/newsweek/?from=rss) > > > moq_discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
