Quoting Ant McWatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Quoting Ant McWatt April 14th (starting with a spin from the "Ragged 
> Trousered Philanthropists"):
> 
> >The GP deputising service ("Grimecare") mentioned in the Independent 
> >article is private!
> >
> >Note the first sentence from "Grimecare's" website:
> >
> >"Grimecare is part of the Nestor Healthcare Group, the UK's number one 
> >independent provider of personnel and service solutions to the fast-growing 
> >health and social care market."
> >
> >http://www.primecare.uk.net
> >
> >
> >As Platt meant to say... privatised healthcare, thanks but no thanks!  :-)
> 
> 
> Platt Holden replied to the above April 14th:
> 
> Nice try, Ant. To repeat the headline and first sentence of the Independent
> story:
> 
> "Neglectful' NHS told dying woman to take laxatives
> By Jeremy Laurance, Health Editor
> Published: 13 April 2007
> 
> "A 36-year-old mother of four died in agony as a result of "gross" errors
> by NHS staff made on two separate occasions, an inquest found."
> 
> Last time I looked, NHS means Britain's National Health Service, a 
> socialized
> system of government health care.
> 
> 
> Ant McWatt comments:
> 
> Look again my short-sighted friend.  The article doesn't state whether these 
> "NHS staff" were from the public or private sectors (though we know 
> definitely, from later in the article, that some of them were from the 
> privatised "Grimecare").  As I mentioned earlier this month, since the 1980s 
> when the NHS began to follow the Thatcher introduced philosophies of 
> right-wing US business "gurus", it's been a mix of privatised and publically 
> owned services (rather than the just the latter).  Hence, amongst other 
> conservative follies, the expensive mess you mentioned about the recent 
> updating of the NHS computer system into one network.
> 
> (BTW, if you require references about Thatcher's misplaced love affair with 
> right-wing US business "gurus", look at the bibliography of my education 
> essay at robertpirsig.org)
> 
> 
> Platt Holden continued April 14th:
> 
> Or perhaps I should no longer believe Jos Laycock that the Independent is
> an example of professional, i.e., accurate journalism?
> 
> Ant McWatt comments:
> 
> Or perhaps you should look into an issue properly before spouting nonsense 
> about it? :-)
> 
> 
> Quoting ARLO J BENSINGER April 14th:
> 
> >Platt's correct in quoting the first sentence, but Ant is correct in 
> >pointing
> >out that the negligence is the fault of Primecare (a privitized health
> >provider). Read the article, and you'll see that.
> 
> >The link is here 
> >(http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,2056106,00.html)
> 
> Platt Holden replied to Arlo April 14th:
> 
> So then it would appear that the journalistic professionalism of the 
> Independent
> is not what Jos Laycock purported it to be, given that that both the 
> headline
> and the lead are misleading.
> 
> Ant McWatt comments:
> 
> So now it's the paper's fault that you didn't read the full article 
> properly?
> 
> Platt continued April 14th:
> 
> Am I now to scratch that paper from my list of trustworthy news sources?
> 
> Ant McWatt comments:
> 
> That would be a mistake on your part as Jos Laycock is indeed correct to 
> point out that the Independent is one of the most trustworthy newspapers 
> published in the UK.
> 
> Platt continued April 14th:
> 
> Where shall I go in England to find a straight-talking newspaper?
> The Sun? At least I presume the girls it features are genuine.
> 
> Ant McWatt comments:
> 
> Well, being a Murdoch owned rag, it comes as no surprise that the Sun has an 
> equally low journalistic quality on a par with the other Murdoch owned media 
> sources you often quote on this forum.
> 
> Anyway, to expand this argument, the NHS is an example of when a particular 
> ideology is followed blindly irrespective of its appropriateness for a 
> particular service or provision of goods.  The MOQ shows that what _works 
> best_ in practice must be given priority above the tenets of any particular 
> static ideology (whether that's socialism or capitalism or whatever).  
> Hence, selling automobiles is fine within a 100% free market (you're not 
> going to die if you don't have the latest Oldsmobile) but selling healthcare 
> isn't.  Privatising the NHS to any further extent than it is already isn't 
> the answer to its problems.
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Anthony
> 
> 
> .
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Txt a lot? Get Messenger FREE on your mobile.  
> https://livemessenger.mobile.uk.msn.com/
> 
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 




-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to