[Ham] > If you can produce any evidence apart from observed "behavior" that supports > the concept of inorganic awareness, I will be most interested.
I hope you will not accept "any evidence apart from observed "behavior"". Are you holding out for divine revelation? [Craig, previously] > you need to show the MoQ explanation (that you've rejected) is incompatible > with yours. [Ham] > I think my statement IS incompatible with the MoQ in this respect. What > more is there for me to "show"? It would seem that the burden of proof lies > in your corner. No, you got it backwards. I've given an example (attraction of magnetic North & South poles) that your theory & the MoQ account for. If you think the theories are incompatible, you must have in mind some test case that one will account for & the other not. Craig moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
