Craig --

> I hope you will not accept "any evidence apart from observed "behavior".
> Are you holding out for divine revelation?

No.  Are you?
I asked you for evidence to support rhe notion of "inorganic awareness".  I 
do not support it; scientists don't support it, most philosophers don't 
support it; you apparently do.  Which is why I said the burden of proof lies 
with you.

[Craig]:
> No, you got it backwards.  I've given an example (attraction of magnetic
> North & South poles) that your theory & the MoQ account for.
> If you think the theories are incompatible, you must have in mind some
> test case that one will account for & the other not.

The attraction of magnetic poles is proof of a physical principle, not 
inorganic awareness.  You impute awareness of value to this principle 
without justification.  Neither awareness nor value is implicated in 
magnetic force.  Unless you can show me some evidence that it is, I can only 
conclude that you believe it because Pirsig says it must be so.

Your turn.

--Ham


moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to