-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Krimel
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 1:22 PM
To: [email protected]
[Krimmel]
I think Pirsig and certainly many of the MoQers do not really get how
interesting this is. Note Pirsig's dismissal of the idea that the MoQ
would be a metaphysics of randomness. Boy, he missed the boat by not
running with that idea.
{Ron]
I agree, a metaphysics of randomness would be more accurate and would
not elude
To misinterpretation that the term "moral" may imply. Fact is we just do
not know.
An inter-related system of dynamic value is about as close as we can get
On any sort of concept. I dunno, I get what others say about it but
maybe it is my
Preconception that makes me fidgety over "moral" or "betterness"
... I just have a hard time with the idea
that this is all headed somewhere. 'Good' seems to me is what is most
suitable for survival
That which secures continuance in the value field as currently
manifested.
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
