[Micah has asked]
When did they hold the vote on whether people needed to be ruled?

[Arlo had answered]
What a great question! 

Of course, Marx believed that the overthrow of the bourgeoisie would begin
atemporary time of transitional rule by a Party speaking for the workers
(thecommunist party), but that this would eventually disappear as communities
wouldorganize into self-governing "communes" (to simplify a bit) with little to
no"authoritative" government. In other words, people who "vote" that they
"didnot need to be ruled".

"The "first phase" [of the communist revolution] would eventually give way to
a"higher phase" in which class differences were eliminated, and a state was
nolonger needed." (Wikipedia on Communism)

Many consider this a pipe-dream, given the seemingly insurmountable obstacle
ofhuman greed, ambition and desire for power (and they may be right). But
takesolace knowing that Marx, like you, decried the final need for a "state"
aswell.

[SA]
An individualist program sounds like 'My way or the highway'. ... When we have
all these 'My Way or the Highway' individuals walking around, is that the
stereotypical 'Wild, Wild, West'?

[Ron]
I thought too if individualism was pushed to extreme the "anarchist" label
could be dusted off and thrown around. 

[Arlo]
Anyone who cites the Sex Pistols should have a beer bought for them. First one
is on me, Ron.

"Anarchists are those who advocate the absence of the state, arguing that
common sense would allow for people to come together in agreement to form a
functional society allowing for the participants to freely develop their own
sense of morality, ethics or principled behaviour." (Wikipedia)

This certainly sounds like something both Micah and Marx would endorse. And
quite frankly it sounds here surprisingly MOQish, doesn't it? I mean, the
"state" is not the "social level", under Anarchism people still engage
socially. Its not a "every man on his own deserted island" idea.

One question jumps out, and that is how reasonable is this "utopia"? If man's
basic nature is towards greed and power, and Pirsig is right that the social
level is (in part) a way to excise authority in forcing man to behave
"civilly", wouldn't Anarchism quickly devolve into the "Wild, Wild West" as SA
mentions?

Wouldn't "might makes right" become the norm? Isn't that why we created a
socialized police force and a socialized judiciary system in the first place?
(And why people like Platt aren't Anarchists, they only play one on TV.)

And then there are the sub-anarchies, anarcho-communism and anarcho-capitalism.
Here Marx and Micah would likely split ways, as anarcho-communism "advocates
the abolition of the State and capitalism in favor of a horizontal network of
voluntary associations, workers' councils and/or commons through which everyone
will be free to satisfy their needs", while anarcho-capitalism "advocates the
elimination of the state; the provision of law enforcement, courts, national
defense, and all other security services by voluntarily-funded competitors in a
free market rather than by taxation; the complete deregulation of nonintrusive
personal and economic activities; and a self-regulated market." (Wikipedia)

Aside from the "property" issue, do not both of these presume more about human
nature than appears evident today? Who would protect the anarcho-whatever
nation from the hordes of immigrants or terroristic destruction? With no police
or judiciary, would we hunt down killers with angry mobs a ala Wild, Wild West?
(Which might be fun, I've always wanted to be in a posse.)

If you read the entry on anarcho-capitalism, however, it contains a key
difference from modern capitalism, not simply the abolition of taxation. With
the abolition of all government, including a treasury, human enterprise takes
on a more "guild" system of production. Without "money" to mediate labor and
reward, there is no factory lines, no mass production, just butchers, bakers
and candlestick makers, with each trading his/her "goods" for other "goods", a
al a barter economy.

Just some thoughts, as I crank up my Never Mind the Bollocks CD.





moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to