[Ian]
Talking bollocks and rulers at the same time, The queen ain't no human bein' -
don'tcha know ?

[Arlo]
"God Save the Queen" is a scathing commentary on tiered valuation of human life
(in this sense aristocratic). Rock, when it has been most important and not
simply narcisstic self-deification, is indeed a very artistic and very relevant
commentary on social issues.

[Ian]
Whatever the history of oppressive forms or rule and various popular or
anarchistic revolutions against those - surely most governance arises by
pragmatic choice in "the free world".

[Arlo]
Yes, I agree. I am no Anarchist (although I play one in my dreams). I don't run
from the idea of social governance, and side with the Contributor Formerly
Known as Case that one of the biggest dupes pulled on the American people is
the Raygun Era "government is the problem".

I support social-collectivist programs such as a socialized police force, a
socialized military, a socialized judiciary, and a socialized treasury. I
support "force at the point of a gun" to prevent people from murder and rape. I
support using the forceful hand of government to maintain a federal reserve,
and forcing people at the point of a gun to support it. I don't pretend to be a
"individualist" as Platt does while supporting such encompassing socialist
programs. I see these socialist programs as beneficial for the reasons I
earlier articulated to Micah (likely the only true "individualist" among us, I
am waiting to hear his comments on anarcho-capitalism), namely that restricting
one freedom (the freedom to rape) increases the overall freedoms for everyone.
Sure, in Arlo's Socialist Utopia you would not have the freedom to rape, but
don't you think you'd be freer for it? 

Platt wants to pretend he's an "individualist", and use the word "collectivist"
as a term of derision for others, but it is clear he supports some of the most
far reaching and forceful social programs we have (the US Treasury tops the
bill, in my book, but the police and military are not far behind). He condemns
using "force", and yet wants me locked up for not muffling my motorcycle, or
others locked up for choosing to wear hajibs. But I digress...

Back to Anarchism. I have a hard time envisioning this without picturing the
Wild West, as SA commented. And I'd be surprised to see many self-professed
"individualists" support abolishing a socialized treasury. What's funny is that
most Marxists I have read would likely have little problem with
anarcho-capitalism, as it places the rewards of one's labor into the laborer's
hands, rather than a (as Marx might say) a bottom-feeding bourgeoisie. While
anarcho-communism may be slightly more utopic than anarcho-capitalism, both
rely on a human nature that is rarely evident in the real world. Greed, the
lust for power, is so prevalent that its hard to NOT see it is inherent human
nature. But then I picture Tibetan communities and am reminded that perhaps
these utopias are possible.

[Ian]
It's simply a natural evolution of humans as intelligent social animals to
understand that governance is more valuable than none. 

[Arlo]
And I'd say that this is the MOQ position, yes. 

[Ian]
Of course, the government we get we deserve - won't get fooled again, here
comes the new boss, same as the old boss, etc. ... unless we "participate"
(with our brains).

[Arlo]
With so much propaganda and distortion emanating out of our dichotomous
political system, I think that real change must be preceded by drastic (dare I
say "revolutionary") changes to the system.

Political stances aside, I find it quite scary that we could get another
"Clinton" as President, and that supposing this "Clinton" holds the office for
two terms, we will likely then get another "Bush" (Jeb) next. Which would mean
that from 1992-? we would have either a "Bush" or a "Clinton" as president. A
stretch of possible 32 years (Clinton, Clinton, Bush, Bush, Clinton, Clinton,
Bush, Bush). 

"God Save the Monarchy", anyone?


moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to