[Marsha]
> Pirsig has stated clearly that Quality cannot be
> defined. If Quality
> is defined as "betterness", how would you
> explain/dismiss the following:
> If everything is betterness, and there is nothing
> that is not
> betterness, then there is no meaning to betterness,
> for there is no
> way of distinguishing a difference between
> betterness and nonbetterness.
Without your two previous posts Marsha, in which
you talk about water and how anything that is
non-water is a misunderstanding I probably wouldn't
have understood you above. When I read this above I
think I get what your saying. It is the same as the
question in the tiny skull [MD]. Instead of saying,
"What is Quality?", your saying, "What is
betterness?". This question can be answered staticly,
but also, you might be saying that we are not to
forget that this question still remains. So, no
matter how much we answer, "What is betterness?", we
still will have the question mark to handle.
crickets,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________Boardwalk
for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's
economy) at Yahoo! Games.
http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
