Your not confusing. Yes, quality is undefined
and defined. You say mu. I agree with mu. I say ?
and ? is mu.
SA
[Marsha]
> Sorry if I'm confusing. To me, the MoQ is a
> monist,
> metaphysics based on an undefined Quality. Quality
> is
> everything. Quality is without definition, meaning
> or
> connotation. Quality, while experienced, is beyond
> human
> understanding. Betterness is a term with a positive
> connotation and
> cannot equate to Quality. Betterness is a
> relational term. Quality
> is not relational. Quality is everything, and
> therefore when plugged
> into the water analogy it stays unchanged: having no
> meaning,
> undefined. Betterness is a word based on
> comparison. A monistic
> Quality doesn't allow for comparison. And a
> betterness, which is
> based on comparison, cannot be monistic. A
> relational term like
> betterness becomes absurd when placed in the water
> analogy.
>
> Another way to look at Quality is to see it as
> representing ALL
> values which would equate to NO value. (Does this
> make sense?)
>
> Of course, while considering the MOQ within a 3rd or
> 4th
> level, comparison is inevitable. But not in a MOQ
> reality. The two
> shouldn't be confused.
>
> Mu, or as Hathor might put it, moo.
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
____________________________________________________________________________________Pinpoint
customers who are looking for what you sell.
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
