Hello everyone

>From: "David M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To: <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [MD] Animals and Dynamic Quality
>Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 22:47:01 +0100
>
>Hi Micah
>
>Might point would be what could happen is different and
>has a form of reality that what could not happen does not have.
>It can rain water, it can't rain cats and dogs. The possible is real
>and determines where the present can go. The past is merely static
>the future the source of the dynamic.

Hi David

I found this article to be of interest (you might have to copy and paste it 
into your browser):

http://www.newscientist.com/channel/fundamentals/mg19125710.900-whats-done-is-done-or-is-it.html

If I read the article correctly, the past is not merely static, nor is the 
future Dynamic. All there is is the present. The present shapes 
(Dynamically) both past and future.

But I could be wrong...

Dan


moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to