Krimel said:
No, I am saying that to the extent that there is a problem you have done
nothing to define or clarify it. The "problem" in fact seems to exist, to
paraphrase James ever so slightly, as "floating in the vast cloud of
experiences that are wholly subjective, that are non-substitutional, that
find not even an eventual ending for themselves in the perceptual world --
they're mere day-dreams and joys and sufferings and wishes of the your
mind.
These exist _with_ one another, indeed, and with the objective nuclei, but
out of them it is probable that to all eternity no interrelated system of
any kind will ever be made."
dmb says:
You can't be serious. You've read Pirsig's attacks on scientific materialism
and you've seen Wilber's complaints about flatland so I'm guessing you have
your tongue firmly in your cheek. I can see how a person might not
understand the problem or agree that there is a problem. But if you think
I'm making this up then you're about half as smart as I thought you were.
_________________________________________________________________
Play games, earn tickets, get cool prizes. Play nowit's FREE!
http://club.live.com/home.aspx?icid=CLUB_hotmailtextlink1
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
