Quoting "Laycock, Jos (OSPT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Partly, 
> Can you offer me an alterntive source of information then, most things I came
> accross had a similar bent. I'm getting the impression that you see Strauss 
> as a
> positive influence but can't see anything  online from which you could have
> derived such an opinion? 

Actually most of what I know about Strauss I've learned from Arlo who, as we
know, is not exactly your unbiased source of information. The article in Wiki
about Strauss seems slanted although I'm sure it attempts to be more an 
example of "critical thinking" than evidenced by Arlo. One phrase in the Wiki 
article
about Strauss struck me, however. "A political scientist examining politics 
with a
value-free scientific eye, for Strauss, was impossible, not just a tragic
self-delusion." Sounds much like something Pirsig would agree with. 

In any case, the influence of Strauss on the current Administration is tenuous
at best, especially since libs consider Bush and his cohorts to be imbeciles. 
Instead, the greatest influence on conservatives was Milton Friedman, and before
him, F.A. Hayek. 

Hope this answers your question.

Platt
  


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to