In Title 1- when I used to do my annual report- we had to assess the kids using a standardized test. All kids being served in our program were expected to progress MORE than one year- as -they are receiving reading instruction in the regular classroom- (a full year's growth) AND they were receiving additional reading instruction- so we were required to bring every child's reading level up a year plus more..... as that is what the supplemental instruction was supposed to be providing....
----- Original Message ----- From: "Debbie Goodis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mosaic: A Reading Comprehension Strategies Email Group" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2007 8:55 AM Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] Interventions vs. good instruction > Hi, > When I read this part I thought that maybe I should ask this question. My > principal tells us that we can only expect to bring a child up ONE GRADE > LEVEL! Is this also true for your school? Or are you expected to bring > students who are more than one year behind up to grade level? > Debbie > > > Let's assume I'm using good scientifically research based > instructional practices, and things are going great. Except for > little girl A and little boy B. They are improving, but are so > far behind from where they should be, for a variety of reasons. > What do I do now? > > > > --------------------------------- > Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel. > _______________________________________________ > Mosaic mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to > http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org. > > Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. > > _______________________________________________ Mosaic mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org. Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.
