---- Joy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

=============
I'm wondering about how to differentiate between good instruction and 
interventions after rereading Allington. My class this year spans the wide 
divide. I have several who could probably enroll in college and handle the 
reading load, and several who can barely read on a first or second grade level. 
Only a handful of students are in the middle.

Let's assume I'm using good scientifically research based instructional 
practices, and things are going great. Except for little girl A and little boy 
B. They are improving, but are so far behind from where they should be, for a 
variety of reasons. What do I do now?

I'm supposed to use scientifically research based interventions, but that is 
what I've been doing in the classroom. Clearly these children need additional 
help, and I must gather data on how they respond to intervention to take to the 
Student Support Team for review and reccomendation (following all the federal 
guidelines that I won't go into here). They can't get additional help from the 
resource teacher any other way.

Does anyone have any ideas? Should I hold a few things back so I can use them 
for interventions?

This may seem obvious to you, but I'm really stuck!

Thanks!




Joy/NC/4
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How children learn is as important as what they learn: process and content go 
hand in hand. http://www.responsiveclassroom.org

---------------------------------
Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! 
FareChase.
_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.


--Hello Joy,
I feel I am not as qualified as you to answer the questions that you ask, but I 
will give my best educational response.
My feeling is that you need to try everything you can. These students must 
clearly need one on one instruction with someone to get them at least as high 
as 1 year below grade their level if they are lower. (I am thinking of one 
Grade 8 student I know who is reading on level 2.6).
I think you might need to find someone from outside the classroom who could 
work with these students who are closer to their age than we are. Someone from 
the Middle or High School may spark them to perform and go further. (Our high 
school has students come into the elementary schools 3 times a week as part of 
their class requirements.) If you are already providing the best instructional 
practices, (peer conferencing, partner reading etc.) than I think the students 
could use the help of a mentor tutor. I had high school students and 
volunteers, to come in and work one on one with my students. The yournger 
students thought of them as a big brother or sister and loved the attention, 
which I think helped to motivate them. For whatever reason, these students 
became extremely focused when their person came to work with them in the 
classroom. They were allowed to pick 2 friends each time to work with them. 
They loved that! And the others in the room wanted to be picked!
I had the student work on skills using various interventions (ie: computer, 
board games, puzzle matching letters to pics, using magnetic letters to create 
words, word concentration games, elonin boxes, Fountas & Pinnell games etc.)
Your emails are inspirational for me and I hope my ideas help you with your 
thinking,

Michele Polselli NBCT '06
Literacy Coordinator & K Teacher
Portsmouth School Dept.
Portsmouth, RI 02871
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 

Reply via email to