Hi Beverlee,
I had saved this post to respond to at a later time but never intended to wait 
a month, as it turns out, to do so.  However, given a recent conversation on 
the Daily5 listserv it is more appropriate that I am responding now.  
 
There has been a thread on word walls over the last few days on the Daily 5 
listserv.  One teacher, specifically, has been describing how she does picture 
word walls with her students.  The teacher chooses 15 words a week from a 
current reading selection (seems a lot to me) and over a period of 2 - 3 days 
(seems a long time to spend on somewhat isolated vocabulary instruction) 
illustrates the meanings of the words while the kids copy her illustrations or 
create their own as a memory piece for the meaning of the word.  The teacher's 
illustration, I think, goes on the word wall and the children have a vocabulary 
folder or notebook into which they insert their week's word pictures.  
Although, on face value this seems like a worthwhile way to remember vocabulary 
it seems that an inordinate amount of isolated time is being spent on words to 
the detriment of the same amount of time being used to read independently.  All 
of the reviews of the research that I've read say that extensive reading is 
what produces high levels of vocabulary knowledge.  I think illustrating words 
is a good strategy to use but it seems that in the example I've described it is 
being overused.  I think teachers tend to do this sometimes by taking a good 
idea and turning it into a bad idea by overusing it or making everybody do the 
same thing regardless of how useful it is to individual learners.  I use big 
words with my students and then they start using those big words back because 
we employ them in meaningful contexts with interesting books and focused 
lessons.  In a previous post I wrote about teaching my students about what a 
miscue was and then they started pointing out their miscues and mine (a 
favorite activity as it turned out!)  when they were reading on their own or 
when I was doing a read aloud.
Elisa 
 
Elisa Waingort
Grade 2 Spanish Bilingual
Dalhousie Elementary
Calgary, Canada



What I didn't include in Elisa's response was her description of vocabulary 
acquisition: usage, scaffolding, usage, scaffolding... and that's what I've 
seen through the years with both immersion kids and ELL/LEP kids.  I just 
haven't seen any evidence that big words on worksheets/workbooks transfer.  
I've seen plenty of evidence that USING big words transfers.  And I'd guess 
that Elisa would agree that using big words along with concrete experiences 
pays the biggest dividends.  My guess is that the next-most-profitable would be 
using big words with symbolic experience (following the math metaphor here), 
such as when reading a picture book, would be the next-more-effective.  The 
least effective would be defining words with more abstract words.

Some of the vocabulary programs sold today seem to me to be a way to make us 
(educators) and the public "feel better" that we're actually doing something in 
regard to vocabulary acquisition and are "bridging the gap" between the haves 
and have nots.  Also, we can believe our students are "accountable" for 
vocabulary acquisition when we use these programs.  Translation:  we have a 
grade for a grade book.

The heartbreaking agony of this whole topic of vocabulary acquisition to me is 
that when someone like Elisa talks about usage/scaffolding, we see a rich 
language environment with lots of experiences, and know that's what works.  But 
with the current pandemic of testing, testing, testing, that's the part of our 
curriculum we cut out!!  We take away (and I'm not faulting any of us) the very 
thing which does teach enable children to acquire language, including 
vocabulary.

And, to make it all the more frustrating, sad-to-the-bone to me is that our 
professional newbies are seeing education as it is today and extrapolating that 
that's all it can (or should) be.  Dry, "efficient," droning.
For years I have used big words when reading aloud and helped kids get the 
meaning by explaining them right along with what's in the actual text. Other 
times, I've just kept reading in anticipation of the story doing its work. Make 
sense?Elisa

_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 

Reply via email to