On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Alice Wiegand <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi Harel, > > On 27 February 2012 08:02, Harel Cain <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Does anyone have a clear list of who was actually involved with MR and > whose > > participation should/must be provided for, and by whom exactly? > > No, that's why I've created > > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles/Working_group_meeting_2012-3-29 > > > > My personal take here: have a meeting of MR people who are already at the > > conference, and that's it. I find it rather difficult to justify paying > from > > donors' money for more people on top of that, for one more meeting in a > > process that's basically approaching its final stage. Any other decision > > must come with a commitment by some organization [WMF?] to bear the cost. > > That's why I've asked SJ about the budget. > Thank you, Alice. We will need to know the decision on this so we can all plan our month ahead. I personally have other commitments that I will have to postpone if I am to make it there in time. :-) But I do believe that since we started this project, we need to conclude it appropriately, and that will require participation from the core team of contributors, and not just those who are incidentally present at the conference. I think we need to be very clear on what ideas should and should not be attributed to our work. In any case, I hope we all make it to the MR meeting, and in case a decision to the contrary is to be made, I'd appreciate if it is communicated to us soon. Thanks! anirudh _______________________________________________ > Movementroles mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles >
_______________________________________________ Movementroles mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
