> > *I'm not sure if I understand what you wanted to say, Béria. Which no > chapters entities are you speaking of?* > * > *
http://lists.wikimedia.ch/private/chapters/2012-February/004230.html - Harel almost invited them (with WMDE blessing). The only reason he didn't was the overwhelming refusal from pretty much all the people in the mailing list. *Seven days ago I've written a mail about starting the wrap up and there > was nearly no response. * > And? That in some way invalidate the meeting? How old are we to react with a "*No one answered me, so now I don't wanna play anymore?*" > *And at the same time people started to registrate for the conference in > Berlin before there was any discussion about the circumstances of such a > meeting. > * http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles/Working_group_meeting_2012-3-29- created by you BTW. What the problem with discuss the meeting now? If we don't discuss things with a 3 months notice, they aren't valid? We all knew would have a MR meeting in Chapters Conference (We knew so much that when Harel created the registration page he created the MR spot: http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Conference_2012/Participants&oldid=3227652). And that was only 15 days ago. *The work that needs to be done must be done before this or any other > meeting and then the meeting can be a small and short exchange. * > I'm very glad you believe the work will be that easy, Alice. But if is easy or not, isn't in question here. What is in question is that we need representation to call this a MR meeting, and now we don't. _____ * * *[image: Inline images 1]* *Béria Lima* * * * Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano.* *Ajude-nos a construir esse sonho.* <http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos>** * ** <http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos>* On 27 February 2012 10:27, Alice Wiegand <[email protected]> wrote: > On 27 February 2012 13:54, Béria Lima <[email protected]> wrote: > >> *Harel, It is nice to see your spirit of inclusiveness as the program >>> manager. I recall you suggested inviting some of the "other entities" we >>> are discussing within the group, just last month.* >>> >> >> That is actually very true. If WMDE was willing to spend LOTS of money to >> bring people from other no chapters entities to the meeting... >> >> .... why not use the same money to bring the MR people? They are much >> more valuable and you can't go with your first idea anyway. >> > > I'm not sure if I understand what you wanted to say, Béria. Which no > chapters entities are you speaking of? > > Seven days ago I've written a mail about starting the wrap up and there > was nearly no response. And at the same time people started to registrate > for the conference in Berlin before there was any discussion about the > circumstances of such a meeting. I'm very glad that it starts now although > I'm quite surprised that you are still discussing as if there is still "a > group" and I don't want to manifest this picture. > > The work that needs to be done must be done before this or any other > meeting and then the meeting can be a small and short exchange. > > It would be still very helpful to have some more hands working on the > wrap-up: > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles/Wrap_up > > Best, Alice. > > > >
_______________________________________________ Movementroles mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
