Christopher Jahn wrote:
> And it came to pass that JTK wrote:
>
>
>>Jay Garcia wrote:
>>
>>>jukola wrote:
>>>
>>>>JTK wrote:
>>>>
>>[snip]
>>
>>
>>>>>Wh... why does *MOZILLA* have a registry key that says
>>>>>*NETSCAPE* not once, but *twice*?!?!?!? Mozilla and
>>>>>Netscape are completely and utterly separate entities,
>>>>>the Netscape Maozilla Politburo says so!
>>>>>
>>>>>What's going on here? Where am I?!? This is not my
>>>>>beautiful house....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>What's more, I used to have NS 6.01 but threw it out some
>>>>time ago since I couldn't get along with it too well. I
>>>>installed Mozilla 0.9.1 yesterday and you know what? All
>>>>my preferred screen layouts etc. were identical to the
>>>>old NS 6.01. I didn't have to make any changes at all
>>>>to fit my preferences. Mozilla 0.9.1 even "imported" an
>>>>odd font selection I used on one of the news groups in
>>>>6.01! Coincidence, or, ?
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>kola
>>>>
>>>When you uninstalled 6.01 you probably left behind
>>>MOZREGISTRY.DAT and that's where Mozilla is getting the
>>>leftover prefs.
>>>
>>>
>>But... then why did NETSCAPE 6.01, which as I keep getting
>>told is TOTALLY UNRELATED TO MOZILLA, leave behind something
>>with "MOZ" in the name?!?!??! That seems contrary to reason,
>>doesn't it?
>>
>>
> Who keeps telling you that? Netscape *6* is very closely
> related to Mozilla - it's Communicator that has "utterly
> no" relationship.
>
> On the other hand, Mozilla isn't Netscape 6.
>
> Try it this way:
> Squares are rectangles, but rectangles are not squares
> Netscape is Mozilla, but Mozilla is not Netscape.
>
> Does that clarify things a little?
>
>
>
I'm afraid you're wasting your time with this troll.
