Carlfish wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:19:17 +0100, Gavin Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > somehow managed to type: > > >I *plonked* with as much prejudice as this crappy MS news client would > >allow me, but I suspect that many others just blocked the moving > >target. > > When someone finds me a GUI client that does even half the things slrn > does, I'll be amazed, So why don't we just take the slrn code and add it to Mozilla! Oh wait, then AOL couldn't use it, since it's GPLed.
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Jay Garcia
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Christopher Jahn
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Dad7732
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Holger Metzger
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? DeMoN_LaG
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Carlfish
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? jesus X
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Gavin Long
- [Offtopic] Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Carlfish
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Mike Koenecke
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Garth Wallace
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Garth Wallace
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? jesus X
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? jesus X
