jesus X wrote > JTK wrote: > > Carlfish wrote: > > > HTH, HAND, *plonk* > > Anyway, didn't you "*plonk*" me already Charlie? > > When people reply to you, that's a good sign you haven't been plonked yet. This particular troll has changed his (faked) e-mail address more than once, presumably _because_ he noticed that no-one was replying. I *plonked* with as much prejudice as this crappy MS news client would allow me, but I suspect that many others just blocked the moving target. The "didn't you plonk me already" was presumably a childish nose-thumbing. -- gav Playing: TFC1.5; Tachyon: The Fringe; Now reading: Fairyland, Paul J McAuley; Just read: Cosmonaut Keep, Ken MacLeod; Just Read: To Hold Infinity, John Meaney; Thief Of Time, Terry Pratchett;
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Jay Garcia
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Jay Garcia
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Christopher Jahn
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Dad7732
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Holger Metzger
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? DeMoN_LaG
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Carlfish
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? jesus X
- [Offtopic] Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Gavin Long
- [Offtopic] Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Carlfish
- Re: [Offtopic] Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Mike Koenecke
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Garth Wallace
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Garth Wallace
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? jesus X
