On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:19:17 +0100, Gavin Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
somehow managed to type:
>I *plonked* with as much prejudice as this crappy MS news client would
>allow me, but I suspect that many others just blocked the moving
>target.
When someone finds me a GUI client that does even half the things slrn
does, I'll be amazed, but probably still won't use it. (because I wouldn't
be able to detach it in screen[1] and take it to work.)
Things like being able to gradually reduce the priority of messages based
on how many newsgroups they're cross-posted to, or whether they've got
all-caps subject lines become invaluable very quickly. And being able to
automagically highlight anything that's a follow-up to your own post is
nice for busy groups. (or when you just need an ego-boost)
Charles Miller
[1] The author of screen should be sainted.
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Jay Garcia
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Christopher Jahn
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Dad7732
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Holger Metzger
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? DeMoN_LaG
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Carlfish
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? jesus X
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Gavin Long
- Re: [Offtopic] Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Carlfish
- Re: [Offtopic] Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Mike Koenecke
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Garth Wallace
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Garth Wallace
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? jesus X
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? jesus X
