Mama Cass Elliot wrote: > > In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard Henno Buschmann say > these wise words: > > > Hallo, > > > > Gervase Markham wrote: > > > >>>It doesn't matter how many browser you checked. You will never have > >>>chacked it on all. > * ^^^^^^^^ > > >> This could be said of any web site, including the improved version > >> which you are about to produce. > > > > Yea, but than it is valid HTML and if the browser couldn't interpret > * ^^^^^^^^^^ > > it, its not our fault. > > I just hope that you can write HTML better than you can spell even basic > English words! > > And, It's "project" - not "projekt"! The word "It's" should not have been capitalized. > seeya - wouldn't wanna be ya. "Seeya" is incorrect. "wanna" is incorrect. "ya" is incorrect. See how lame spelling flames are? -- Gord McFee [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
- Re: OT: about criticising o... Hans-Peter Fischer
- Re: OT: now it's about the ... Peter Lairo
- Re: OT: now it's about the ... Hans-Peter Fischer
- Re: OT: about criticising o... Hans-Peter Fischer
- Re: OT: about criticising o... Parish
- Re: OT: about criticising o... Niko Pavlicek
- Re: OT: about criticising o... JTK
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.or... Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.or... Gervase Markham
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.or... Henno Buschmann
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.or... Gord McFee
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.or... RV
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.or... Gord McFee
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.or... Steve Bowen
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org Chris Hoess
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org Michael Nahrath
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org (was: wow) Jon Hall
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org (was: wow) Gervase Markham
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org (was: wow) Henri Sivonen
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org (was: w... Gervase Markham
- Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML on mozilla.org (wa... Michael Nahrath
