Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org

[Henno Buschmann]

Hallo,

Gervase Markham wrote:

>>Yea, but than it is valid HTML and if the browser couldn't interpret it,
>>its not our fault.
>>
> You'd rather we used valid HTML that looked terrible/crashed browsers than
> slightly invalid or deprecated HTML which worked everywhere?
I don't know. But it isn't necessary. You can achiev both (at least in the

most common browsers and with valid HTML you have a better chance not to crash

all the other browsers).


Regards,
-- 
    Henno Buschmann * [EMAIL PROTECTED]

    Windows API Programmierung (Tutorials): http://www.win-api.de/
    return 0; // No error occurred