Hans-Peter Fischer wrote:
>On Wed, 18 Jul 2001 16:22:29 -0400 RV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>No, my name is not Ram�n. ;-)
>>
>
>So let's call you Ramiro. ;-)
>
Don't waste the time. You will never guess it
>
>
>>>Note that in Asian
>>>societies people traditionally did not feel the same urge to show off
>>>their individuality.
>>>
>>I am not sure that is true either
>>
>
>Then you should learn a bit more about Asia.
>
Maybe I know much more about that isse than you think. ;-)
>
>
>>I don't think the purpose of Mozilla is to changes people's life's
>>philosophy.
>>
>
>Neither do I. The point I was trying to make is essentially that using
>words like "individuality" and "uniqueness" in connection with something
>so basic as changing themes is absurd.
>
You still don't get it. As i said in my posting to you in Spanish? Why
the same kinds of car come in different colors? Why clothes come in
diffent colors? Why people cut their hair in different ways? Why people
use different kinds of jewelry (even when it's 99 cents fakes). Do you
think people who want to have a "choice" is an absurd concept. At th end
it boils down to the very same concepts you find absurd. The mere action
of changing a theme doesn't make a person an individual or unique, that
would be way very simplistic. But most people like to have choices that
reflect their personality / mood / interest. It might not appply to you,
but it certainly interest a hell of a lot of people. ;-)
>>By allowing people to configure or to chose a theme that is to the
>>liking of a user is not to make Mozilla a toy. Even if every user sets
>>just one Theme and never change it again, just the ability to change it
>>to "the one" they like is great advantage over another software that
>>forces me to accept a default fixed one.
>>
>
>Garth already replied to that.
>
And?
**************
Enough of this. Let other people express their feelings about it.
