>>You still don't get it. As i said in my posting to you in Spanish? Why
>>the same kinds of car come in different colors? Why clothes come in
>>diffent colors? Why people cut their hair in different ways? Why people
>>use different kinds of jewelry (even when it's 99 cents fakes). Do you
>>think people who want to have a "choice" is an absurd concept. At th end
>>it boils down to the very same concepts you find absurd. The mere action
>>of changing a theme doesn't make a person an individual or unique, that
>>would be way very simplistic. But most people like to have choices that
>>reflect their personality / mood / interest. It might not appply to you,
>>but it certainly interest a hell of a lot of people. ;-)
>>
>
> You are misinterpreting me and claiming that I don't get you while it's
> you who doesn't get me.
>
> I do *not* find it absurd that people want to have a consumer choice,
> and I do *not* find the concepts of individuality and uniqueness absurd
> in themselves. I find it absurd to associate one with the other.
Well, they ARE "associated" with another. The real questions you are
raising is: at what point is the overlap so large that the person has
become too "superficial"? At what point is the overlap so small that the
person is no longer in touch with the world around him/her?
So now that we have established that there is a link (weak or strong),
we need to decide what we *choose* to do about how much or little of the
superficial fun-factor/uniqueness we want to have with Mozilla, and by
extension, making Theme-switching easily visible and accessible. ;)
--
Regards,
Peter Lairo
