"RV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hans-Peter Fischer wrote:
>
> >
> >To summarize: I agree with you when you say that many people -
> >especially young people - may wish to change themes in order to boost
> >their individuality, but I disagree with THEM about whether that's a
> >sensible way of achieving that. And I certainly don't see the reason why
one
> >would change themes all the time, so that a separate menu item for that
> >would be justified. If I were a cynic (which of course I am not ;-) I'd
> >say: Mozilla should not become a toy for adolescents but a stable and
> >efficient tool for grown-ups.
> >
> By allowing people to configure or to chose a theme that is to the
> liking of a user is not to make Mozilla a toy. Even if every user sets
> just one Theme and never change it again, just the ability to change it
> to "the one" they like is great advantage over another software that
> forces me to accept a default fixed one.
So how does letting people change the theme in the preferences
dialog remove the ability for the user to find "the one" theme
they like? I mean, theme choice is a preference (you prefer one
over another) and therefore it makes sense to have it in the
prefs dialog, and people will look for it there.
