Garth Wallace wrote:
> "RV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>>Hans-Peter Fischer wrote:
>>
>>
>>>To summarize: I agree with you when you say that many people -
>>>especially young people - may wish to change themes in order to boost
>>>their individuality, but I disagree with THEM about whether that's a
>>>sensible way of achieving that. And I certainly don't see the reason why
>>>
> one
>
>>>would change themes all the time, so that a separate menu item for that
>>>would be justified. If I were a cynic (which of course I am not ;-) I'd
>>>say: Mozilla should not become a toy for adolescents but a stable and
>>>efficient tool for grown-ups.
>>>
>>>
>>By allowing people to configure or to chose a theme that is to the
>>liking of a user is not to make Mozilla a toy. Even if every user sets
>>just one Theme and never change it again, just the ability to change it
>>to "the one" they like is great advantage over another software that
>>forces me to accept a default fixed one.
>>
>
> So how does letting people change the theme in the preferences
> dialog remove the ability for the user to find "the one" theme
> they like? I mean, theme choice is a preference (you prefer one
> over another) and therefore it makes sense to have it in the
> prefs dialog, and people will look for it there.
>
>
>
The easier you make it for the average user to access their favorite
buttons/preferences/choices, etc, the easier it will be to retain an
audience and stay ahead of the "other guys" !!! :-D
--
Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion
Novell MCNE-5/CNI
UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
Post To Group ONLY, No Email Please!!
