[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Carlfish) wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 28 Jul 2001:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 22:23:01 -0500, Mr Bluster
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> somehow managed to type:
>>Carlfish wrote:
>>>
>>> IE renders standards-compliant websites better than NN. This is a
>>> simple matter of fact - IE supports far more of the DOM and CSS
>>> standards than NN4, even if it is still a light year behind
>>> Mozilla, and even if it does also add its own non-standard
>>> "embrace and extend" features.
>>
>>"IE renders standards-compliant websites" is an oxymoron, what the
>>hell ARE you smoking anyways ???
>>
>>/mr b
>
> Please come back when you are at least mildly conversant with the
> facts. Have a nice day.
Sorry, but he is right. IE is the least standards complient of anything
even remotely resembling a web browser. The only thing IE renders
correctly is stuff made by frontpage, and it's own proprietary
extensions such as BGSound. Go to http://www.libpr0n.com with IE and
then with Moz. Does IE still render anything correctly?
--
ICQ: 123728792
AIM: FlyersR1 9
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_ = m
