And it came to pass that Jerry Baker wrote:
> Apparently no one is investigating the poor adoption of
> Mozilla/NN6 at all.
Try reading netscape.public.beta.feedback.*
NC4.x users make it very clear why they haven't changed:
-N6/6.01 were bug-ridden nightmares, especially Mail and News
-Mail & News still not performing at reliable levels
-N6xx/Moz lacks many of the features found in NC4.xx. For
business and institutional installations, these features are
mission critical. (LDAP, ".slt" free installation, addressbook
export, password protection between users, PGP signature, v-
card, and 100% acceptance at business sites, particular bank
sites are the most common mentioned)
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( Dionysian Reveler
I've learned that no matter how much I care, some people are
just
assholes
To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Vadir Puovkin <Vadir Puovkin
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Carlfish
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Mr Bluster
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Jay Garcia
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Carlfish
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Mr Bluster
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage DeMoN LaG
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Bill Lee
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Jerry Baker
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Ian Hickson
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Christopher Jahn
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Christopher Jahn
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Henri Sivonen
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Mircea Romantan
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage DeMoN LaG
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Mircea Romantan
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Christopher Jahn
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Matthew Thomas
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Henri Sivonen
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Mozilla and NN6 Usage Pratik
