What kind of problems do you mean. I can't think of one. "Matthew Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Jonas J�rgensen wrote: > >... > > In my opinion, naming the first final version Mozilla 5.0 will solve > > tons of problems and complications, and I can't really see any good > > reasons not to. I'm I the only one who thinks this is a good idea? > >... > > No, you're not the only one. > > -- > Matthew `mpt' Thomas, Mozilla UI Design component default assignee thing > <http://mozilla.org/> > >
- Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jonas J�rgensen
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Matthew Thomas
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jeroen Roeterd
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Richter
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 David Gerard
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Richter
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jeroen Roeterd
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Richter
