> My point is: Go to a website that offers links to the various web > browsers. You'll have IE v5.x, Netscape 4.7x, NEtscape 6.1, Opera 5.x, > and mozilla 1.x. To the average user, the higher numbers are better. > mozilla 1.x will likely be the last one they even consider. "It's the > oldest one, right ??" > > Hall > No, Mayby people will read reviews of the software and think,... mmmhh mozilla needed only 1 release to provide this browser and Microsoft needed for a equal browser 6 versions. Lets try the product that got it right the first time. I don't think that a lot of people will say " Mmh, a 1.x version.... must be a bad program". Netscape 6 wasn't recieved with applause also and it has a "high" versionnumber. Jeroen Roeterd
- Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jonas J�rgensen
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Matthew Thomas
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jeroen Roeterd
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Richter
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 David Gerard
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Richter
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jeroen Roeterd
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Richter
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Asa Dotzler
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jonas J�rgensen
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 JTK
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Garth Wallace
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Garth Wallace
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jonas J�rgensen
