Hall Stevenson wrote:
> > > > In my opinion, naming the first final version
> > > > Mozilla 5.0 will solve tons of problems and
> > > > complications, and I can't really see any good
> > > > reasons not to. I'm I the only one who thinks
> > > > this is a good idea?
> > >
> > > No, you're not the only one.
> >
> > Mozilla already calls itself 5.0
> > You are referring to Revisions 0.9.2, 0.9.3, 0.9.4, 1.0 etc.
> > Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:0.9.3)
> > Gecko/20010801
>
> Yeap, someone who reads their webserver's log files will see
> that... Wait, joe-user doesn't run a webserver.
>
> What the general public sees is that they're running Internet
> Explorer v5.x, Netscape v4.xx, or Netscape v6.x. Or worse,
> mozilla 1.0...
>
> How about 'mozilla 2001' ??? ;-)
>
> Hall
Nope, you can see it directly in your Mozilla, by:
1. Help | About Mozilla, or
2. Type about: in your Location Toolbar.
Gus
