Matthew Thomas wrote: > Jonas J�rgensen wrote: > >... > > In my opinion, naming the first final version Mozilla 5.0 will solve > > tons of problems and complications, and I can't really see any good > > reasons not to. I'm I the only one who thinks this is a good idea? > >... > > No, you're not the only one. > > -- > Matthew `mpt' Thomas, Mozilla UI Design component default assignee thing > <http://mozilla.org/> Mozilla already calls itself 5.0 You are referring to Revisions 0.9.2, 0.9.3, 0.9.4, 1.0 etc. Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010801 Gus
- Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jonas J�rgensen
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Matthew Thomas
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jeroen Roeterd
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Richter
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 David Gerard
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Richter
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jeroen Roeterd
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Richter
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Asa Dotzler
