> 2. Anyone who wants to quote Downloads.com to me will have to explain
> why anyone would be downloading IE from them instead of directly from
> Microsoft, and why I should care what their completely unscientific web
> polls say.
Perhaps you have to ask this the 145,559 people which have downloaded IE
6.0 so far from download.com
> 3. Anyone who wants to try to tell me that '*perception* (all that
> matters) is that we're faster than IE' needs to explain to me then why
> not a single, verifiable, repeatable number indicates that Mozilla is
> faster than IE at anything. Otherwise, what you're telling me is that
> this '*perception*' is a figment of the imagination of the Mozilla
> Faithful. And unless you want Mozilla to stay at ~0.5% market
> penetration, figments won't cut it friends.
goto cnet.com
goto chip.de
their numbers shows that netscape 6.1 is faster than IE in page loading.
But I'm sure you don't believe this numbers. And I haven't seen one
site stating that Netscape 6.1 (or moz) is 4 times slower than IE. Thats
the biggest bullshit I've heard. Moz renders pages faster than IE, get
over it!
