{-- Rot13 - Hateme wrote:
> DeMoN LaG <n@a> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>
>>Actually numerous tests have proven that Mozilla/Netscape 6.1 is faster
>>than IE6 on Windows 2000. Go look them up on Cnet
>>
>>
>
> The fact that IE6 is slow on Windows 2000 does not mean that mozilla
> can be legally slow on windows 98. Compare an apple
> to a bad apple is not better than compare it to an orange.
>
> If IE6 can be fast on Windows 98, then mozilla should be
> able to be fast on windows 98 too.
>
We're talking about a matter of milliseconds difference in speed. Now,
if we're talking SECONDS that may be a different matter. Who gives a
ratsazz if one is 2 ms faster than the other ??? And besides, in order
to post a true value you have to run these so-called speed tests in a
sterile medium without the benefit of congestion/connection anomalies.
What's 'faster' in one venue can be slower in another but we're still
talking milliseconds. BAH !! Nothing but marketing hype.
--
Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion
Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI
UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
